Itanium 9760 vs Xeon Phi 3120P

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Phi 3120P and Itanium 9760 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameKnights Corner (2012−2014)no data
Release date17 June 2013 (11 years ago)1 April 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Phi 3120P and Itanium 9760 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores57 (Heptapentaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads22816
Base clock speedno data2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHzno data
Bus rateno data6.4 GT/s
L1 cache32 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB (shared)32 MB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size350 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Phi 3120P and Itanium 9760 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPCIe x16LGA1248
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 3120P and Itanium 9760. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Security technologies

Xeon Phi 3120P and Itanium 9760 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 3120P and Itanium 9760 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 3120P and Itanium 9760. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data
ECC memory support-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 June 2013 1 April 2017
Physical cores 57 8
Threads 228 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 170 Watt

Xeon Phi 3120P has 612.5% more physical cores and 1325% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Itanium 9760, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 76.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 3120P and Itanium 9760. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 3120P and Itanium 9760, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Phi 3120P
Xeon Phi 3120P
Intel Itanium 9760
Itanium 9760

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Phi 3120P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate Itanium 9760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Phi 3120P or Itanium 9760, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.