EPYC 7302 vs Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core and EPYC 7302 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.52
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data12.72
Architecture codenamePaxville (2002−2005)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release dateDecember 2005 (19 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$978

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core and EPYC 7302 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache16 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size213 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors200 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core and EPYC 7302 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22 (Multiprocessor)
Socket604TR4
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core and EPYC 7302. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core and EPYC 7302 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core and EPYC 7302. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 155 Watt

Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core has 14.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7302, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core and EPYC 7302. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core and EPYC 7302, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core
Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core
AMD EPYC 7302
EPYC 7302

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 53 votes

Rate EPYC 7302 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core or EPYC 7302, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.