Xeon X5698 vs L5640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5640
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 60 Watt
2.92
+34.6%
Xeon X5698
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
2.17

Xeon L5640 outperforms Xeon X5698 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5640 and Xeon X5698 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16591857
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.70no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.611.58
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)14 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$200no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5640 and Xeon X5698 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2.26 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)12288 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5640 and Xeon X5698 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA13661366
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5640 and Xeon X5698. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon L5640 and Xeon X5698 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5640 and Xeon X5698 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5640 and Xeon X5698. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5640 and Xeon X5698.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5640 2.92
+34.6%
Xeon X5698 2.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5640 4645
+34.8%
Xeon X5698 3447

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.92 2.17
Recency 16 March 2010 14 February 2011
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 4
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon L5640 has a 34.6% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and 116.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon X5698, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months.

The Xeon L5640 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5698 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5640 and Xeon X5698, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5640
Xeon L5640
Intel Xeon X5698
Xeon X5698

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 59 votes

Rate Xeon L5640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate Xeon X5698 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5640 or Xeon X5698, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.