Atom E680 vs Xeon L5609

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5609 and Atom E680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1886not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency4.92no data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Tunnel Creek (2010)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)14 September 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5609 and Atom E680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.86 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm226 mm2
Maximum core temperature63 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5609 and Atom E680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366Intel BGA 676
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5609 and Atom E680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon L5609 and Atom E680 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5609 and Atom E680 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5609 and Atom E680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5609 and Atom E680.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5609 3298
+853%
Atom E680 346

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 March 2010 14 September 2010
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 4 Watt

Xeon L5609 has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom E680, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon L5609 and Atom E680. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon L5609 is a server/workstation processor while Atom E680 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5609 and Atom E680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5609
Xeon L5609
Intel Atom E680
Atom E680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon L5609 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom E680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5609 or Atom E680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.