Atom E680 vs Xeon L5609
Aggregate performance score
Xeon L5609 outperforms Atom E680 by a whopping 845% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon L5609 and Atom E680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1897 | 3202 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 4.92 | 5.21 |
| Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Tunnel Creek (2010) |
| Release date | 16 March 2010 (14 years ago) | 14 September 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon L5609 and Atom E680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | 26 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 63 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 47 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon L5609 and Atom E680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 | Intel BGA 676 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 4 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5609 and Atom E680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon L5609 and Atom E680 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5609 and Atom E680 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5609 and Atom E680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 288 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel GMA 600 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5609 and Atom E680.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.08 | 0.22 |
| Recency | 16 March 2010 | 14 September 2010 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 4 Watt |
Xeon L5609 has a 845.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Atom E680, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 900% lower power consumption.
The Xeon L5609 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E680 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon L5609 is a server/workstation processor while Atom E680 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5609 and Atom E680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
