Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs Xeon L5508
Primary details
Comparing Xeon L5508 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 759 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 5 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 14.82 |
| Architecture codename | Gainestown (2009−2010) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 (15 years ago) | 21 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon L5508 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 37 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon L5508 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 1366 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5508 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon L5508 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5508 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5508 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon Vega 7 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5508 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 March 2009 | 21 July 2020 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon L5508 has 71.1% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon L5508 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon L5508 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5508 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
