Pentium E5700 vs Xeon L5335

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5335
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 50 Watt
1.09
+60.3%
Pentium E5700
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.68

Xeon L5335 outperforms Pentium E5700 by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5335 and Pentium E5700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24152736
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.110.05
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.060.99
Architecture codenameClovertown (2006−2007)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date13 August 2007 (17 years ago)8 August 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$380$110

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon L5335 has 120% better value for money than Pentium E5700.

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5335 and Pentium E5700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (per die)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size2x 143 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)60 °Cno data
Number of transistors582 million228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.1V-1.25V0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5335 and Pentium E5700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketPLGA771LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5335 and Pentium E5700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon L5335 and Pentium E5700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5335 and Pentium E5700 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5335 and Pentium E5700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboardDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5335 and Pentium E5700.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5335 1.09
+60.3%
Pentium E5700 0.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5335 1737
+60.1%
Pentium E5700 1085

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.09 0.68
Recency 13 August 2007 8 August 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon L5335 has a 60.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 30% lower power consumption.

Pentium E5700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon L5335 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E5700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5335 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium E5700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5335 and Pentium E5700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5335
Xeon L5335
Intel Pentium E5700
Pentium E5700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Xeon L5335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 949 votes

Rate Pentium E5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5335 or Pentium E5700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.