Opteron 3320 EE vs Xeon L3110

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L3110
2009
45 Watt
0.84
Opteron 3320 EE
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.21
+44%

Opteron 3320 EE outperforms Xeon L3110 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L3110 and Opteron 3320 EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25642327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.774.58
Architecture codenameno dataDelhi (2012−2013)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)4 December 2012 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon L3110 and Opteron 3320 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed3 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cacheno data4096 KB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L3110 and Opteron 3320 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L3110 and Opteron 3320 EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Xeon L3110 and Opteron 3320 EE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L3110 and Opteron 3320 EE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L3110 and Opteron 3320 EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L3110 and Opteron 3320 EE.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L3110 0.84
Opteron 3320 EE 1.21
+44%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L3110 1338
Opteron 3320 EE 1918
+43.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 1.21
Recency 1 January 2009 4 December 2012
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt

Opteron 3320 EE has a 44% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The Opteron 3320 EE is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L3110 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L3110 and Opteron 3320 EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L3110
Xeon L3110
AMD Opteron  3320 EE
Opteron 3320 EE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon L3110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 3320 EE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L3110 or Opteron 3320 EE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.