Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Xeon Gold 6448Y

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6448Y
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
38.06
+114%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.75

Xeon Gold 6448Y outperforms Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6448Y and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking79344
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.92no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency16.0147.99
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date10 January 2023 (1 year ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,583no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6448Y and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads6416
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache60 MB16 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)79 °Cno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6448Y and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA4677FP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6448Y and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6448Y and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6448Y and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6448Y and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR5-4400no data
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6448Y and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

PCIe version5no data
PCI Express lanes80no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6448Y 38.06
+114%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 17.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6448Y 60449
+114%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 28189

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.06 17.75
Recency 10 January 2023 13 June 2023
Physical cores 32 8
Threads 64 16
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon Gold 6448Y has a 114.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 542.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6448Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6448Y is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6448Y and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6448Y
Xeon Gold 6448Y
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6448Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 45 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6448Y or Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.