Xeon Platinum 8358 vs Gold 6314U

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6314U
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
30.23
Xeon Platinum 8358
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 250 Watt
34.26
+13.3%

Xeon Platinum 8358 outperforms Xeon Gold 6314U by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6314U and Xeon Platinum 8358 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking139112
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency13.9612.97
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6314U and Xeon Platinum 8358 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache48 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °C81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6314U and Xeon Platinum 8358 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6314U and Xeon Platinum 8358. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6314U and Xeon Platinum 8358 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXYes with Intel® SPSYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6314U and Xeon Platinum 8358 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6314U and Xeon Platinum 8358. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size6 TB6 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6314U and Xeon Platinum 8358.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes6464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6314U 30.23
Xeon Platinum 8358 34.26
+13.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6314U 48013
Xeon Platinum 8358 54416
+13.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.23 34.26
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 250 Watt

Xeon Gold 6314U has 22% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8358, on the other hand, has a 13.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The Xeon Platinum 8358 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6314U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6314U and Xeon Platinum 8358, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
Xeon Gold 6314U
Intel Xeon Platinum 8358
Xeon Platinum 8358

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6314U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 25 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8358 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6314U or Xeon Platinum 8358, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.