Ryzen 5 7600 vs Xeon Gold 6250

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6250
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 185 Watt
13.22
Ryzen 5 7600
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
17.12
+29.5%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon Gold 6250 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6250 and Ryzen 5 7600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking566375
Place by popularitynot in top-10061
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.97
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency6.7324.82
Architecture codenameno dataRaphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date1 January 2020 (4 years ago)14 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6250 and Ryzen 5 7600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.9 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data71 mm2
Maximum core temperature60 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno dataCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6250 and Ryzen 5 7600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA3647AM5
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6250 and Ryzen 5 7600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-5125 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6250 and Ryzen 5 7600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6250 and Ryzen 5 7600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6250 and Ryzen 5 7600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6250 and Ryzen 5 7600.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4824

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6250 13.22
Ryzen 5 7600 17.12
+29.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6250 20915
Ryzen 5 7600 27095
+29.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.22 17.12
Recency 1 January 2020 14 January 2023
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Gold 6250 has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7600, on the other hand, has a 29.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 184.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6250 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6250 and Ryzen 5 7600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6250
Xeon Gold 6250
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
Ryzen 5 7600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1207 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6250 or Ryzen 5 7600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.