EPYC 7532 vs Xeon Gold 6246

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6246
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 165 Watt
15.63
EPYC 7532
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
33.21
+112%

EPYC 7532 outperforms Xeon Gold 6246 by a whopping 112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7532 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking434118
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.96no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD EPYC
Power efficiency8.9615.71
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)19 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,286no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads2464
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3324
L1 cache768 KB2 MB
L2 cache12 MB16 MB
L3 cache24.75 MB256 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7532 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7532 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7532.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6246 15.63
EPYC 7532 33.21
+112%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6246 24829
EPYC 7532 52755
+112%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.63 33.21
Recency 2 April 2019 19 February 2020
Physical cores 12 32
Threads 24 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 200 Watt

Xeon Gold 6246 has 21.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7532, on the other hand, has a 112.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7532 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6246 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7532, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6246
Xeon Gold 6246
AMD EPYC 7532
EPYC 7532

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6246 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6246 or EPYC 7532, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.