Xeon D-2799 vs Gold 6242R

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6242R
2020
20 cores / 40 threads, 205 Watt
21.58
+1.5%
Xeon D-2799
2022
20 cores / 40 threads, 129 Watt
21.27

Xeon Gold 6242R outperforms Xeon D-2799 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6242R and Xeon D-2799 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking248258
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.0428.12
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency9.9615.60
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
Release date24 February 2020 (4 years ago)24 February 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,529$1,972

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon D-2799 has 65% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6242R.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6242R and Xeon D-2799 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads4040
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache1.25 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache20 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6242R and Xeon D-2799 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt129 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6242R and Xeon D-2799. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data-
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6242R and Xeon D-2799 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6242R and Xeon D-2799 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6242R and Xeon D-2799. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size1 TB1 TB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6242R and Xeon D-2799.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4832
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6242R 21.58
+1.5%
Xeon D-2799 21.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6242R 34282
+1.5%
Xeon D-2799 33792

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.58 21.27
Recency 24 February 2020 24 February 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 129 Watt

Xeon Gold 6242R has a 1.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon D-2799, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 58.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Gold 6242R and Xeon D-2799.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6242R and Xeon D-2799, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6242R
Xeon Gold 6242R
Intel Xeon D-2799
Xeon D-2799

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 12 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6242R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2799 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6242R or Xeon D-2799, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.