Xeon Silver 4210R vs Gold 6240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6240
2019
18 cores / 36 threads, 150 Watt
15.28
+60.5%
Xeon Silver 4210R
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 100 Watt
9.52

Xeon Gold 6240 outperforms Xeon Silver 4210R by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6240 and Xeon Silver 4210R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking458802
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.8727.56
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency9.649.01
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)24 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,445$511

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4210R has 211% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6240.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6240 and Xeon Silver 4210R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3620
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2624
L1 cache1.125 MB640 KB
L2 cache18 MB10 MB
L3 cache24.75 MB13.75 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature85 °C84 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6240 and Xeon Silver 4210R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and Xeon Silver 4210R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6240 and Xeon Silver 4210R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and Xeon Silver 4210R are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and Xeon Silver 4210R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size1 TB1 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and Xeon Silver 4210R.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6240 15.28
+60.5%
Xeon Silver 4210R 9.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6240 24270
+60.5%
Xeon Silver 4210R 15118

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.28 9.52
Recency 2 April 2019 24 February 2020
Physical cores 18 10
Threads 36 20
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 100 Watt

Xeon Gold 6240 has a 60.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 80% more physical cores and 80% more threads.

Xeon Silver 4210R, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6240 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4210R in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6240 and Xeon Silver 4210R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6240
Xeon Gold 6240
Intel Xeon Silver 4210R
Xeon Silver 4210R

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 10 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 38 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4210R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6240 or Xeon Silver 4210R, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.