Ryzen 5 4500 vs Xeon Gold 6240

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6240
2019
18 cores / 36 threads, 150 Watt
16.37
+61.3%
Ryzen 5 4500
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.15

Xeon Gold 6240 outperforms Ryzen 5 4500 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6240 and Ryzen 5 4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking397759
Place by popularitynot in top-10050
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.98no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency10.3314.78
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)4 April 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,445no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6240 and Ryzen 5 4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3612
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache1.125 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache18 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6240 and Ryzen 5 4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647AM4
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and Ryzen 5 4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6240 and Ryzen 5 4500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and Ryzen 5 4500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and Ryzen 5 4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and Ryzen 5 4500.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6240 16.37
+61.3%
Ryzen 5 4500 10.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6240 26000
+61.3%
Ryzen 5 4500 16124

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.37 10.15
Recency 2 April 2019 4 April 2022
Physical cores 18 6
Threads 36 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Gold 6240 has a 61.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen 5 4500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6240 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 4500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6240 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 4500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6240 and Ryzen 5 4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6240
Xeon Gold 6240
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
Ryzen 5 4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 10 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2203 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6240 or Ryzen 5 4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.