Ryzen 5 2600H vs Xeon Gold 6230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6230
2019
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
17.69
+238%

Xeon Gold 6230 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600H by a whopping 238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6230 and Ryzen 5 2600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3721207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.93no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency12.9010.60
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)10 September 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,894no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6230 and Ryzen 5 2600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads408
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2132
L1 cache1.25 MB384 KB
L2 cache20 MB2 MB
L3 cache27.5 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature87 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6230 and Ryzen 5 2600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FP5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6230 and Ryzen 5 2600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6230 and Ryzen 5 2600H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6230 and Ryzen 5 2600H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6230 and Ryzen 5 2600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size1 TB32 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6230 and Ryzen 5 2600H.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4812

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6230 17.69
+238%
Ryzen 5 2600H 5.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6230 27069
+238%
Ryzen 5 2600H 8002

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.69 5.23
Recency 2 April 2019 10 September 2018
Physical cores 20 4
Threads 40 8
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon Gold 6230 has a 238.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

Ryzen 5 2600H, on the other hand, has 177.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6230 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2600H in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6230 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 2600H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6230 and Ryzen 5 2600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6230
Xeon Gold 6230
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
Ryzen 5 2600H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 24 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 11 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6230 or Ryzen 5 2600H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.