EPYC 7F32 vs Xeon Gold 6143

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6143
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 205 Watt
15.60
+7.1%
EPYC 7F32
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
14.57

Xeon Gold 6143 outperforms EPYC 7F32 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6143 and EPYC 7F32 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking444494
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.68
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.207.66
Architecture codenameno dataZen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date1 July 2017 (7 years ago)14 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,100

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6143 and EPYC 7F32 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplierno data37
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cacheno data4 MB
L3 cache22 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6143 and EPYC 7F32 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6143 and EPYC 7F32. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6143 and EPYC 7F32 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6143 and EPYC 7F32 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6143 and EPYC 7F32. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6143 and EPYC 7F32.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6143 15.60
+7.1%
EPYC 7F32 14.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6143 24786
+7.1%
EPYC 7F32 23142

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.60 14.57
Recency 1 July 2017 14 April 2020
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon Gold 6143 has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

EPYC 7F32, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 13.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Gold 6143 and EPYC 7F32.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6143 and EPYC 7F32, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6143
Xeon Gold 6143
AMD EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6143 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6143 or EPYC 7F32, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.