EPYC 7371 vs Xeon Gold 6140

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6140
2017
18 cores / 36 threads, 140 Watt
15.39
EPYC 7371
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
19.38
+25.9%

EPYC 7371 outperforms Xeon Gold 6140 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6140 and EPYC 7371 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking453297
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.825.59
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.4010.79
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)16 November 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,445$1,550

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7371 has 16% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6140.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6140 and EPYC 7371 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3632
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2331
L1 cache1.125 MB96K (per core)
L2 cache18 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature91 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6140 and EPYC 7371 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6140 and EPYC 7371. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6140 and EPYC 7371 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6140 and EPYC 7371 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6140 and EPYC 7371. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size768 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6140 and EPYC 7371.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6140 15.39
EPYC 7371 19.38
+25.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6140 24445
EPYC 7371 30782
+25.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.39 19.38
Recency 25 April 2017 16 November 2018
Physical cores 18 16
Threads 36 32
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 170 Watt

Xeon Gold 6140 has 12.5% more physical cores and 12.5% more threads, and 21.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7371, on the other hand, has a 25.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The EPYC 7371 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6140 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6140 and EPYC 7371, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6140
Xeon Gold 6140
AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 7 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 12 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6140 or EPYC 7371, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.