Ultra 9 288V vs Xeon Gold 6138T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6138T
2017
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
13.49
+7.1%

Xeon Gold 6138T outperforms Core Ultra 9 288V by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6138T and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking570626
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.40no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency9.8438.30
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,742no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6138T and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads408
Base clock speed2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache1.25 MB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache20 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache27.5 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature94 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6138T and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6138T and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6138T and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6138T and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6138T and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6138T and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes484

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6138T 13.49
+7.1%
Ultra 9 288V 12.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6138T 20649
+7.1%
Ultra 9 288V 19288

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.49 12.60
Recency 25 April 2017 24 September 2024
Physical cores 20 8
Threads 40 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 30 Watt

Xeon Gold 6138T has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 150% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Gold 6138T and Core Ultra 9 288V.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6138T is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 288V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6138T and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
Xeon Gold 6138T
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6138T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6138T or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.