Xeon W-3265 vs Gold 6138

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6138
2017
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
15.28
Xeon W-3265
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
18.95
+24%

Xeon W-3265 outperforms Xeon Gold 6138 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6138 and Xeon W-3265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking459313
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.449.25
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency11.578.75
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,612$3,349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3265 has 108% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6138.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6138 and Xeon W-3265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4048
Base clock speed2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2027
L1 cache1.25 MB1.5 MB
L2 cache20 MB24 MB
L3 cache27.5 MB33 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature86 °C78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6138 and Xeon W-3265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Xeon W-3265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6138 and Xeon W-3265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Xeon W-3265 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Xeon W-3265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size768 GB1 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Xeon W-3265.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6138 15.28
Xeon W-3265 18.95
+24%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6138 24264
Xeon W-3265 30105
+24.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.28 18.95
Recency 25 April 2017 3 June 2019
Physical cores 20 24
Threads 40 48
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 205 Watt

Xeon Gold 6138 has 64% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3265, on the other hand, has a 24% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 20% more physical cores and 20% more threads.

The Xeon W-3265 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6138 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6138 and Xeon W-3265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6138
Xeon Gold 6138
Intel Xeon W-3265
Xeon W-3265

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 137 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6138 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 11 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6138 or Xeon W-3265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.