Xeon W-3225 vs Gold 6134

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6134
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
10.84
Xeon W-3225
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 160 Watt
11.68
+7.7%

Xeon W-3225 outperforms Xeon Gold 6134 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6134 and Xeon W-3225 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking736682
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.8412.65
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency7.606.66
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,214$1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3225 has 345% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6134.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6134 and Xeon W-3225 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3237
L1 cache512 KB512 KB
L2 cache8 MB8 MB
L3 cache24.75 MB16.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature79 °C68 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6134 and Xeon W-3225 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt160 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and Xeon W-3225. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6134 and Xeon W-3225 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and Xeon W-3225 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and Xeon W-3225. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size768 GB1 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and Xeon W-3225.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6134 10.84
Xeon W-3225 11.68
+7.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6134 16591
Xeon W-3225 17874
+7.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.84 11.68
Recency 25 April 2017 3 June 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 160 Watt

Xeon Gold 6134 has 23.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3225, on the other hand, has a 7.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Gold 6134 and Xeon W-3225.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6134 and Xeon W-3225, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6134
Xeon Gold 6134
Intel Xeon W-3225
Xeon W-3225

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6134 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-3225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6134 or Xeon W-3225, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.