EPYC 9274F vs Xeon Gold 5318N

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5318N and EPYC 9274F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated42
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.70
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data13.70
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,060

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5318N and EPYC 9274F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4848
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4.05 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.05 GHz
Multiplierno data40.5
L1 cache64K (per core)1536 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)24 MB
L3 cache36 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data8x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5318N and EPYC 9274F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA4189SP5
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5318N and EPYC 9274F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5318N and EPYC 9274F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5318N and EPYC 9274F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5318N and EPYC 9274F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TB6 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5318N and EPYC 9274F.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 April 2021 10 November 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 320 Watt

Xeon Gold 5318N has 113.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9274F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 5318N and EPYC 9274F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5318N and EPYC 9274F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5318N
Xeon Gold 5318N
AMD EPYC 9274F
EPYC 9274F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 5318N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 7 votes

Rate EPYC 9274F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5318N or EPYC 9274F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.