Xeon Gold 6326 vs Gold 5317

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5317
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 150 Watt
17.90
Xeon Gold 6326
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 185 Watt
23.05
+28.8%

Xeon Gold 6326 outperforms Xeon Gold 5317 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5317 and Xeon Gold 6326 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking362229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency10.8811.36
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5317 and Xeon Gold 6326 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2432
Base clock speed3 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache18 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °C78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5317 and Xeon Gold 6326 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5317 and Xeon Gold 6326. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5317 and Xeon Gold 6326 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXYes with Intel® SPSYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5317 and Xeon Gold 6326 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5317 and Xeon Gold 6326. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size6 TB6 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5317 and Xeon Gold 6326.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes6464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5317 17.90
Xeon Gold 6326 23.05
+28.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5317 27387
Xeon Gold 6326 35270
+28.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.90 23.05
Physical cores 12 16
Threads 24 32
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 185 Watt

Xeon Gold 5317 has 23.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6326, on the other hand, has a 28.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6326 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5317 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5317 and Xeon Gold 6326, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5317
Xeon Gold 5317
Intel Xeon Gold 6326
Xeon Gold 6326

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5317 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 27 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6326 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5317 or Xeon Gold 6326, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.