Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs Gold 5120T

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5120T
2017
14 cores / 28 threads, 105 Watt
11.63
+33.7%
Xeon E5-2650 v4
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
8.70

Xeon Gold 5120T outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v4 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5120T and Xeon E5-2650 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking682883
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.622.58
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency10.297.70
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Broadwell-EP (2016)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,727$1,166

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5120T has 79% better value for money than Xeon E5-2650 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5120T and Xeon E5-2650 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2824
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rateno data2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier2222
L1 cache896 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache14 MB3 MB
L3 cache19.25 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data306.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature89 °C80 °C
Number of transistorsno data4700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5120T and Xeon E5-2650 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5120T and Xeon E5-2650 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5120T and Xeon E5-2650 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5120T and Xeon E5-2650 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5120T and Xeon E5-2650 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size768 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5120T and Xeon E5-2650 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4840

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5120T 11.63
+33.7%
Xeon E5-2650 v4 8.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5120T 18127
+33.7%
Xeon E5-2650 v4 13556

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.63 8.70
Recency 11 July 2017 20 June 2016
Physical cores 14 12
Threads 28 24

Xeon Gold 5120T has a 33.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 16.7% more physical cores and 16.7% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 5120T is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2650 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5120T and Xeon E5-2650 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5120T
Xeon Gold 5120T
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
Xeon E5-2650 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 5120T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1629 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5120T or Xeon E5-2650 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.