Xeon E-2314 vs E7320

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E7320
2007
80 Watt
0.92
Xeon E-2314
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
5.13
+458%

Xeon E-2314 outperforms Xeon E7320 by a whopping 458% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E7320 and Xeon E-2314 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25301212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.097.47
Architecture codenameno dataRocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date1 July 2007 (17 years ago)8 September 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E7320 and Xeon E-2314 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed2.13 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.5 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB L2 Cache8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature66 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.0V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7320 and Xeon E-2314 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA604,PPGA604FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7320 and Xeon E-2314. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E7320 and Xeon E-2314 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7320 and Xeon E-2314 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7320 and Xeon E-2314. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7320 and Xeon E-2314.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E7320 0.92
Xeon E-2314 5.13
+458%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E7320 1469
Xeon E-2314 8146
+455%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.92 5.13
Recency 1 July 2007 8 September 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E-2314 has a 457.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2314 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7320 and Xeon E-2314, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7320
Xeon E7320
Intel Xeon E-2314
Xeon E-2314

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E7320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon E-2314 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E7320 or Xeon E-2314, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.