EPYC 9135 vs Xeon E7-8867 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E7-8867 v3
2015
16 cores / 32 threads, 165 Watt
23.24
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56
+57.3%

EPYC 9135 outperforms Xeon E7-8867 v3 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E7-8867 v3 and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22396
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.26
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency13.3217.29
Architecture codenameHaswell-EX (2015)Turin (2024)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E7-8867 v3 and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache45 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die size160 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)79 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7-8867 v3 and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration82
SocketFCLGA2011SP5
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7-8867 v3 and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E7-8867 v3 and EPYC 9135 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7-8867 v3 and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7-8867 v3 and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1333/1600/1866, DDR3-1066/1333/1600DDR5
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7-8867 v3 and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes32128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E7-8867 v3 23.24
EPYC 9135 36.56
+57.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E7-8867 v3 36908
EPYC 9135 58070
+57.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.24 36.56
Recency 1 June 2015 10 October 2024
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 200 Watt

Xeon E7-8867 v3 has 21.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 57.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7-8867 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7-8867 v3 and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7-8867 v3
Xeon E7-8867 v3
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8867 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E7-8867 v3 or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.