Ryzen 5 5600X vs Xeon E7-4880 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E7-4880 v2
2014
15 cores / 30 threads, 130 Watt
31.07
+121%
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
14.04

Xeon E7-4880 v2 outperforms Ryzen 5 5600X by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E7-4880 v2 and Ryzen 5 5600X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking135532
Place by popularitynot in top-10017
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.26
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency22.2020.06
Architecture codenameno dataVermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)8 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E7-4880 v2 and Ryzen 5 5600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores15 (Pentadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3012
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data37
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cacheno data3 MB
L3 cache37.5 MB32 MB
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die sizeno data2x 80.7 + 125 (I/O) mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7-4880 v2 and Ryzen 5 5600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7-4880 v2 and Ryzen 5 5600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E7-4880 v2 and Ryzen 5 5600X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7-4880 v2 and Ryzen 5 5600X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7-4880 v2 and Ryzen 5 5600X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR4
Maximum memory size1.5 TB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7-4880 v2 and Ryzen 5 5600X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes32no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E7-4880 v2 31.07
+121%
Ryzen 5 5600X 14.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E7-4880 v2 48435
+121%
Ryzen 5 5600X 21888

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.07 14.04
Recency 1 January 2014 8 October 2020
Physical cores 15 6
Threads 30 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E7-4880 v2 has a 121.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

Ryzen 5 5600X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 214.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E7-4880 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 5600X in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E7-4880 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 5600X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7-4880 v2 and Ryzen 5 5600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7-4880 v2
Xeon E7-4880 v2
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 19 votes

Rate Xeon E7-4880 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 12918 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E7-4880 v2 or Ryzen 5 5600X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.