Xeon Platinum 8358 vs E5620

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5620
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
2.26
Xeon Platinum 8358
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 250 Watt
34.26
+1416%

Xeon Platinum 8358 outperforms Xeon E5620 by a whopping 1416% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5620 and Xeon Platinum 8358 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1813111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.08no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.6712.97
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$35no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5620 and Xeon Platinum 8358 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5620 and Xeon Platinum 8358 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon Platinum 8358. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5620 and Xeon Platinum 8358 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon Platinum 8358 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon Platinum 8358. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size288 GB6 TB
Max memory channels38
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon Platinum 8358.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5620 2.26
Xeon Platinum 8358 34.26
+1416%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5620 3592
Xeon Platinum 8358 54416
+1415%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.26 34.26
Recency 16 March 2010 6 April 2021
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 8 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 250 Watt

Xeon E5620 has 212.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8358, on the other hand, has a 1415.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8358 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5620 and Xeon Platinum 8358, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5620
Xeon E5620
Intel Xeon Platinum 8358
Xeon Platinum 8358

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 127 votes

Rate Xeon E5620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8358 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5620 or Xeon Platinum 8358, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.