Xeon 5140 vs E5620

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5620
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
2.26
+319%
Xeon 5140
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.54

Xeon E5620 outperforms Xeon 5140 by a whopping 319% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5620 and Xeon 5140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18132835
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.084.27
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.670.79
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Woodcrest (2006)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$35$15

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 5140 has 5238% better value for money than Xeon E5620.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5620 and Xeon 5140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz2.33 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)0 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature78 °C65 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno dataB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5620 and Xeon 5140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon 5140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE40 Bitno data
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5620 and Xeon 5140 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon 5140 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon 5140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon 5140.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5620 2.26
+319%
Xeon 5140 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5620 3592
+319%
Xeon 5140 857

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.26 0.54
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5620 has a 318.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon 5140, on the other hand, has 23.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5140 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5620 and Xeon 5140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5620
Xeon E5620
Intel Xeon 5140
Xeon 5140

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 127 votes

Rate Xeon E5620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon 5140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5620 or Xeon 5140, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.