Ryzen 5 3600XT vs Xeon E5607

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5607
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.69
Ryzen 5 3600XT
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
11.73
+594%

Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Xeon E5607 by a whopping 594% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 5 3600XT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2062668
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.8019.49
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency2.0011.68
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$135$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 3600XT has 2336% better value for money than Xeon E5607.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 5 3600XT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.26 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size239 mm274 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 5 3600XT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366AM4
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 5 3600XT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 5 3600XT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 5 3600XT are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 5 3600XT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size288 GB128 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 5 3600XT.

PCIe version2.04.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5607 1.69
Ryzen 5 3600XT 11.73
+594%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5607 2686
Ryzen 5 3600XT 18630
+594%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 11.73
Recency 14 February 2011 7 July 2019
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5607 has 18.8% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 3600XT, on the other hand, has a 594.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 3600XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5607 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5607 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 3600XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 5 3600XT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5607
Xeon E5607
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
Ryzen 5 3600XT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 5 votes

Rate Xeon E5607 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 544 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5607 or Ryzen 5 3600XT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.