EPYC 7371 vs Xeon E5606
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7371 outperforms Xeon E5606 by a whopping 1214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5606 and EPYC 7371 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2046 | 253 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.43 | 3.79 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| Release date | 14 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 13 November 2018 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $46 | $1,550 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 7371 has 781% better value for money than Xeon E5606.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5606 and EPYC 7371 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.133 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.13 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 1.5 MB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 19200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5606 and EPYC 7371 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | 1366 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 200 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5606 and EPYC 7371. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5606 and EPYC 7371 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5606 and EPYC 7371 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5606 and EPYC 7371. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 170.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5606 and EPYC 7371.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
EPYC 7371 outperforms Xeon E5606 by 1214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
EPYC 7371 outperforms Xeon E5606 by 1215% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.53 | 20.10 |
| Recency | 14 February 2011 | 13 November 2018 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 200 Watt |
Xeon E5606 has 150% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7371, on the other hand, has a 1213.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
The EPYC 7371 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5606 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5606 and EPYC 7371, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
