Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Xeon E5472

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5472
2007
80 Watt
1.44
Ryzen 5 7535HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
11.57
+703%

Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms Xeon E5472 by a whopping 703% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5472 and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2175669
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency1.7031.28
Architecture codenameno dataRembrandt-R (2023)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5472 and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data6 (Hexa-Core)
Threadsno data12
Base clock speed3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.55 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5472 and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771FP7
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5472 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5472 and Ryzen 5 7535HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5472 and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5472 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 660M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5472 and Ryzen 5 7535HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5472 1.44
Ryzen 5 7535HS 11.57
+703%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5472 2286
Ryzen 5 7535HS 18386
+704%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5472 440
Ryzen 5 7535HS 1761
+300%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5472 1406
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6946
+394%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.44 11.57
Recency 1 October 2007 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 45 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 7535HS has a 703.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 650% more advanced lithography process, and 128.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7535HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5472 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5472 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7535HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5472 and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5472
Xeon E5472
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
Ryzen 5 7535HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 96 votes

Rate Xeon E5472 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1389 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5472 or Ryzen 5 7535HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.