E2-9000 vs Xeon E5450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5450
2007
80 Watt
1.63
+167%
E2-9000
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.61

Xeon E5450 outperforms E2-9000 by a whopping 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5450 and E2-9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20952802
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataBristol Ridge
Power efficiency1.935.77
Architecture codenameno dataStoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5450 and E2-9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed3 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.2 GHz
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5450 and E2-9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketLGA771BGA
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5450 and E2-9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5450 and E2-9000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5450 and E2-9000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5450 and E2-9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5450 1.63
+167%
E2-9000 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5450 2582
+167%
E2-9000 967

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 0.61
Recency 1 October 2007 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E5450 has a 167.2% higher aggregate performance score.

E2-9000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5450 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5450 is a server/workstation processor while E2-9000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5450 and E2-9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5450
Xeon E5450
AMD E2-9000
E2-9000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1292 votes

Rate Xeon E5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 314 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5450 or E2-9000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.