Xeon 5160 vs E5410

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5410
2007
80 Watt
1.26
+107%
Xeon 5160
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 80 Watt
0.61

Xeon E5410 outperforms Xeon 5160 by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5410 and Xeon 5160 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22882786
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.15
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.490.72
Architecture codenameno dataWoodcrest (2006)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$22

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5410 and Xeon 5160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.33 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3 GHz
L1 cacheno data0 KB
L2 cacheno data4 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature67 °C65 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35VB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5410 and Xeon 5160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5410 and Xeon 5160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching+-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parity++

Security technologies

Xeon E5410 and Xeon 5160 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5410 and Xeon 5160 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5410 and Xeon 5160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5410 1.26
+107%
Xeon 5160 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5410 2007
+108%
Xeon 5160 963

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5410 340
Xeon 5160 378
+11.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5410 1116
+95.4%
Xeon 5160 571

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.26 0.61
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Xeon E5410 has a 106.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5410 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5160 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5410 and Xeon 5160, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5410
Xeon E5410
Intel Xeon 5160
Xeon 5160

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 48 votes

Rate Xeon E5410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 8 votes

Rate Xeon 5160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5410 or Xeon 5160, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.