i7-9700F vs Xeon E5-4650L

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4650L
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
5.47
Core i7-9700F
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.50
+55.4%

Core i7-9700F outperforms Xeon E5-4650L by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4650L and Core i7-9700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1162902
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.138.69
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i7
Power efficiency4.4212.15
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,685$323

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-9700F has 6585% better value for money than Xeon E5-4650L.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4650L and Core i7-9700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4650L and Core i7-9700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4650L and Core i7-9700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4650L and Core i7-9700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4650L and Core i7-9700F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4650L and Core i7-9700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size384 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4650L and Core i7-9700F.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4650L 5.47
i7-9700F 8.50
+55.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4650L 8533
i7-9700F 13248
+55.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.47 8.50
Recency 14 May 2012 23 April 2019
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-4650L has 100% more threads.

i7-9700F, on the other hand, has a 55.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 76.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-9700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-4650L in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4650L is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-9700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4650L and Core i7-9700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4650L
Xeon E5-4650L
Intel Core i7-9700F
Core i7-9700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 16 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4650L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 669 votes

Rate Core i7-9700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4650L or Core i7-9700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.