Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE vs Xeon E5-4620 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4620 v2
2014
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
6.04
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
6.89
+14.1%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE outperforms Xeon E5-4620 v2 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11041021
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency6.0218.63
Architecture codenameno dataRenoir (2020−2023)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data35
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache20 MB Intel® Smart Cache4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size768 GB128 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4620 v2 6.04
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE 6.89
+14.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4620 v2 9590
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE 10944
+14.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.04 6.89
Recency 1 January 2014 21 July 2020
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-4620 v2 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE, on the other hand, has a 14.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 83.3% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-4620 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4620 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4620 v2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4620 v2
Xeon E5-4620 v2
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 10 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4620 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 59 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4620 v2 or Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.