Atom D425 vs Xeon E5-4617

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4617 and Atom D425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1424not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.17no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency2.89no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90$993

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4617 and Atom D425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads62
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size435 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4617 and Atom D425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4617 and Atom D425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAEno data32 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4617 and Atom D425 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4617 and Atom D425 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4617 and Atom D425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GB4 GB
Max memory channels41
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4617 and Atom D425.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4617 6298
+2987%
Atom D425 204

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2012 21 June 2010
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E5-4617 has an age advantage of 1 year, 500% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D425, on the other hand, has 1200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-4617 and Atom D425. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4617 is a server/workstation processor while Atom D425 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4617 and Atom D425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4617
Xeon E5-4617
Intel Atom D425
Atom D425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 7 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4617 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 63 votes

Rate Atom D425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4617 or Atom D425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.