EPYC 7H12 vs Xeon E5-2699R v4
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 85 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon E5 | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 5.98 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 25 October 2016 (9 years ago) | 18 September 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,560 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2699R v4 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 22 (Docosa-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 44 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 2 × 9.6 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 22 | 26 |
| L1 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| L2 cache | 5.5 MB | 32 MB |
| L3 cache | 55 MB | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | 456.12 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 7200 Million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2699R v4 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 145 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699R v4 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2699R v4 and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699R v4 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699R v4 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699R v4 and EPYC 7H12.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 25 October 2016 | 18 September 2019 |
| Physical cores | 22 | 64 |
| Threads | 44 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 145 Watt | 280 Watt |
Xeon E5-2699R v4 has 93.1% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7H12, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 190.9% more physical cores and 190.9% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon E5-2699R v4 and AMD EPYC 7H12. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2699R v4 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
