Xeon E3-1270 v6 vs E5-2699 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2699 v3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
13.07
+128%
Xeon E3-1270 v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 72 Watt
5.73

Xeon E5-2699 v3 outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v6 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5911136
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.95
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E3
Power efficiency8.377.39
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)28 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$328

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads368
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate9.6 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplierno data38
L1 cache64K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache45 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt72 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1270 v6. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1270 v6. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866
Maximum memory size768 GB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no dataN/A
Max resolution over eDPno dataN/A
Max resolution over DisplayPortno dataN/A
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1270 v6.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 13.07
+128%
Xeon E3-1270 v6 5.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 20381
+128%
Xeon E3-1270 v6 8931

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 907
Xeon E3-1270 v6 1419
+56.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 6352
+42.1%
Xeon E3-1270 v6 4470

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.07 5.73
Recency 8 September 2014 28 March 2017
Physical cores 18 4
Threads 36 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 72 Watt

Xeon E5-2699 v3 has a 128.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 350% more physical cores and 350% more threads.

Xeon E3-1270 v6, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 101.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2699 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1270 v6 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1270 v6, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
Xeon E5-2699 v3
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v6
Xeon E3-1270 v6

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 889 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 44 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1270 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699 v3 or Xeon E3-1270 v6, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.