Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Xeon E5-2699 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2699 v3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
13.31
Ryzen AI 9 365
2024
10 cores / 20 threads, 28 Watt
19.13
+43.7%

Ryzen AI 9 365 outperforms Xeon E5-2699 v3 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen AI 9 365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking589318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency8.3762.30
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Strix Point (2024)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)July 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen AI 9 365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3620
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache45 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen AI 9 365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FP8
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen AI 9 365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen AI 9 365 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen AI 9 365 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen AI 9 365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen AI 9 365.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 13.31
Ryzen AI 9 365 19.13
+43.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 20377
Ryzen AI 9 365 29279
+43.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.31 19.13
Physical cores 18 10
Threads 36 20
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon E5-2699 v3 has 80% more physical cores and 80% more threads.

Ryzen AI 9 365, on the other hand, has a 43.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 417.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 365 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2699 v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2699 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 365 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen AI 9 365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
Xeon E5-2699 v3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Ryzen AI 9 365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 880 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 35 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699 v3 or Ryzen AI 9 365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.