FX-6300 vs Xeon E5-2698 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2698 v4
2016
20 cores / 40 threads, 135 Watt
14.79
+467%
FX-6300
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.61

Xeon E5-2698 v4 outperforms FX-6300 by a whopping 467% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2698 v4 and FX-6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4791714
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.820.52
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency10.322.59
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,226$132

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2698 v4 has 442% better value for money than FX-6300.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2698 v4 and FX-6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads406
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cacheno data288 KB
L2 cache5 MB6144 KB
L3 cache50 MB8192 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size456.12 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C71 °C
Number of transistors7200 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2698 v4 and FX-6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and FX-6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2698 v4 and FX-6300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and FX-6300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and FX-6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and FX-6300.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2698 v4 14.79
+467%
FX-6300 2.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2698 v4 23400
+466%
FX-6300 4137

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2698 v4 1100
+141%
FX-6300 456

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2698 v4 8396
+486%
FX-6300 1432

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.79 2.61
Recency 20 June 2016 23 October 2012
Physical cores 20 6
Threads 40 6
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5-2698 v4 has a 466.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 233.3% more physical cores and 566.7% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

FX-6300, on the other hand, has 42.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2698 v4 is a server/workstation processor while FX-6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2698 v4 and FX-6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
Xeon E5-2698 v4
AMD FX-6300
FX-6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 117 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2698 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4084 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2698 v4 or FX-6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.