Apple M4 (8 cores) vs Xeon E5-2698 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Apple M4 (8 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking499not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.73no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Apple M4
Power efficiency10.08no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)no data
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)28 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,226no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Apple M4 (8 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads408
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L2 cache5 MBno data
L3 cache50 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size456.12 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Apple M4 (8 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Apple M4 (8 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Apple M4 (8 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Apple M4 (8 cores) are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Apple M4 (8 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M4 8-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Apple M4 (8 cores).

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 28 October 2024
Physical cores 20 8
Threads 40 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 5 Watt

Xeon E5-2698 v4 has 150% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

Apple M4 (8 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 2600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Apple M4 (8 cores). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2698 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 (8 cores) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Apple M4 (8 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
Xeon E5-2698 v4
Apple M4 (8 cores)
M4 (8 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 119 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2698 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 (8 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2698 v4 or Apple M4 (8 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.