Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon E5-2697A v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697A v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 145 Watt
14.11
+28.5%
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
10.98

Xeon E5-2697A v4 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking542728
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.733.85
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency8.875.56
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)30 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,891$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has 41% better value for money than Xeon E5-2697A v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2638
L1 cacheno data768 KB
L2 cache4 MB4 MB
L3 cache40 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Million9600 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size1.5 TB2 TiB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4060

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 14.11
+28.5%
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 10.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 21587
+28.4%
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 16809

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 1070
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 1188
+11%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 8269
+40.5%
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 5884

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.11 10.98
Recency 20 June 2016 30 July 2017
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon E5-2697A v4 has a 28.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 24.1% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Xeon E5-2697A v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2697A v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
Xeon E5-2697A v4
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 251 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2697A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 125 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697A v4 or Ryzen Threadripper 1900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.