Xeon Platinum 8163 vs E5-2697 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697 v3
2014
14 cores / 28 threads, 145 Watt
11.59
+1083%
Xeon Platinum 8163
24 cores / 48 threads
0.98

Xeon E5-2697 v3 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8163 by a whopping 1083% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8163 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6762485
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency7.56no data
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8163 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2848
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data25
L1 cache64K (per core)1.5 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)24 MB
L3 cache35 MB (shared)33 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors5,560 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8163 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration28 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011Socket P
Power consumption (TDP)145 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8163. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8163 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8163 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8163. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size768 GB768 GB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8163.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 11.59
+1083%
Xeon Platinum 8163 0.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 18415
+1080%
Xeon Platinum 8163 1561

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.59 0.98
Physical cores 14 24
Threads 28 48
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm

Xeon E5-2697 v3 has a 1082.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon Platinum 8163, on the other hand, has 71.4% more physical cores and 71.4% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-2697 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8163 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8163, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Intel Xeon Platinum 8163
Xeon Platinum 8163

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 689 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8163 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v3 or Xeon Platinum 8163, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.