Xeon Max 9480 vs E5-2697 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697 v2
2013
12 cores / 24 threads, 130 Watt
8.99
Xeon Max 9480
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
55.03
+512%

Xeon Max 9480 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by a whopping 512% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon Max 9480 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking84624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.920.04
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency6.5414.88
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723$12,980

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2697 v2 has 4700% better value for money than Xeon Max 9480.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon Max 9480 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads24112
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate8GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)112.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size160 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data64 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon Max 9480 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA20114677
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon Max 9480. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon Max 9480 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon Max 9480 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon Max 9480. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon Max 9480.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697 v2 8.99
Xeon Max 9480 55.03
+512%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697 v2 14284
Xeon Max 9480 87420
+512%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.99 55.03
Recency 1 September 2013 10 January 2023
Physical cores 12 56
Threads 24 112
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 350 Watt

Xeon E5-2697 v2 has 169.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon Max 9480, on the other hand, has a 512.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 366.7% more physical cores and 366.7% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Max 9480 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2697 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon Max 9480, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Xeon E5-2697 v2
Intel Xeon Max 9480
Xeon Max 9480

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 760 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 12 votes

Rate Xeon Max 9480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v2 or Xeon Max 9480, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.