Xeon E5-2630L v4 vs E5-2696 V3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2696 V3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
13.90
+121%
Xeon E5-2630L v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 55 Watt
6.30

Xeon E5-2696 V3 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v4 by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2630L v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5281062
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.69
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency9.0710.84
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$612

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2630L v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3620
Base clock speed2.3 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rateno data2 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data18
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)2.5 MB
L3 cache45 MB (shared)25 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data62 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2630L v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22 (Multiprocessor)
Socket2011-3FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2630L v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2630L v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2630L v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2630L v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channelDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133
Maximum memory sizeno data1.5 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.3 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2630L v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 13.90
+121%
Xeon E5-2630L v4 6.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 22074
+121%
Xeon E5-2630L v4 10000

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.90 6.30
Recency 8 September 2014 20 June 2016
Physical cores 18 10
Threads 36 20
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon E5-2696 V3 has a 120.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 80% more physical cores and 80% more threads.

Xeon E5-2630L v4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 163.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2696 V3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2630L v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon E5-2630L v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2696 V3
Xeon E5-2696 V3
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v4
Xeon E5-2630L v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 1205 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2696 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 14 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2630L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2696 V3 or Xeon E5-2630L v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.