Athlon 64 X2 5600+ vs Xeon E5-2696 V3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2696 V3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
13.78
+2318%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.57

Xeon E5-2696 V3 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5600+ by a whopping 2318% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5382833
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency8.990.61
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)December 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads362
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512K
L3 cache45 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Die size356 mm2220 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket2011-3AM2
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channelno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 13.78
+2318%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 0.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 21890
+2324%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 903

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 1136
+392%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 231

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 8127
+1927%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 401

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.78 0.57
Physical cores 18 2
Threads 36 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 89 Watt

Xeon E5-2696 V3 has a 2317.5% higher aggregate performance score, 800% more physical cores and 1700% more threads, and a 309.1% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 X2 5600+, on the other hand, has 62.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2696 V3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2696 V3 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2696 V3
Xeon E5-2696 V3
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Athlon 64 X2 5600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 1235 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2696 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 116 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2696 V3 or Athlon 64 X2 5600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.