Xeon E5-2650 vs E5-2695 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2695 v3
2014
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
10.61
+128%
Xeon E5-2650
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
4.66

Xeon E5-2695 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Xeon E5-2650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7311278
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.34
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency8.334.62
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)6 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$91

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Xeon E5-2650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2816
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache35 MB (shared)20480 KB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size356 mm2435 mm2
Maximum core temperature83 °C77 °C
Number of transistors2,600 million2,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Xeon E5-2650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Xeon E5-2650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access--
Demand Based Switching++
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Xeon E5-2650 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Xeon E5-2650 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Xeon E5-2650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GB384 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Xeon E5-2650.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2695 v3 10.61
+128%
Xeon E5-2650 4.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2695 v3 16790
+128%
Xeon E5-2650 7370

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.61 4.66
Recency 8 September 2014 6 March 2012
Physical cores 14 8
Threads 28 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5-2695 v3 has a 127.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2650, on the other hand, has 26.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2695 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2650 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Xeon E5-2650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3
Xeon E5-2695 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2650
Xeon E5-2650

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 106 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2695 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 178 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2695 v3 or Xeon E5-2650, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.