i7-5820K vs Xeon E5-2695 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2695 v3
2014
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
10.57
+70.5%
Core i7-5820K
2014
6 cores / 12 threads, 140 Watt
6.20

Xeon E5-2695 v3 outperforms Core i7-5820K by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Core i7-5820K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7401085
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.19
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency8.294.17
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Haswell-E (2014)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$410

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Core i7-5820K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2812
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/s0 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache35 MB (shared)15 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size356 mm2356 mm2
Maximum core temperature83 °C67 °C
Number of transistors2,600 million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Core i7-5820K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Core i7-5820K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Smart Responseno data+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Core i7-5820K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-+
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Core i7-5820K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Core i7-5820K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4
Maximum memory size768 GB64 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s68 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Core i7-5820K.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4028

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2695 v3 10.57
+70.5%
i7-5820K 6.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2695 v3 16790
+70.6%
i7-5820K 9841

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.57 6.20
Physical cores 14 6
Threads 28 12
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 140 Watt

Xeon E5-2695 v3 has a 70.5% higher aggregate performance score, 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2695 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-5820K in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2695 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-5820K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2695 v3 and Core i7-5820K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3
Xeon E5-2695 v3
Intel Core i7-5820K
Core i7-5820K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 106 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2695 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 389 votes

Rate Core i7-5820K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2695 v3 or Core i7-5820K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.