Core i5-2400 vs Xeon E5-2689
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2689 outperforms i5-2400 by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2689 and Core i5-2400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1014 | 1687 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 35 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.39 | 0.86 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Xeon | Core i5 (Desktop) |
| Architecture codename | no data | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 6 March 2012 (12 years ago) | 9 January 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $60 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i5-2400 has 121% better value for money than Xeon E5-2689.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2689 and Core i5-2400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6144 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 216 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 73 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,160 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2689 and Core i5-2400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 1155 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Core i5-2400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2689 and Core i5-2400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Core i5-2400 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Core i5-2400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD 2000 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Core i5-2400.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon E5-2689 outperforms Core i5-2400 by 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon E5-2689 outperforms Core i5-2400 by 156% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.41 | 2.50 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 95 Watt |
Xeon E5-2689 has a 156.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
i5-2400, on the other hand, has 21.1% lower power consumption.
The Xeon E5-2689 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-2400 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2689 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-2400 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2689 and Core i5-2400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
