EPYC 7443 vs Xeon E5-2682 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2682 v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
11.77
EPYC 7443
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
35.63
+203%

EPYC 7443 outperforms Xeon E5-2682 v4 by a whopping 203% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC 7443 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking664105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.95
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency9.2816.86
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,010

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC 7443 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3248
Base clock speedno data2.85 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier2128.5
L1 cacheno data1536 KB
L2 cache4 MB12 MB
L3 cache40 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size456.12 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors7200 Million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC 7443 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
Socketno dataSP3
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC 7443. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC 7443 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC 7443 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC 7443. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1,536 GB4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC 7443.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 11.77
EPYC 7443 35.63
+203%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 18702
EPYC 7443 56601
+203%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.77 35.63
Recency 20 June 2016 12 January 2021
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 32 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 200 Watt

Xeon E5-2682 v4 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7443, on the other hand, has a 202.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7443 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2682 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC 7443, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4
Xeon E5-2682 v4
AMD EPYC 7443
EPYC 7443

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 132 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2682 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7443 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2682 v4 or EPYC 7443, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.